Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Vic Summers's avatar

I appreciate not all your subscribers are sensible and mature Hearts fans like me and you have to satisfy their ‘needs’

1. “Celtic, written off back in January, are somehow still standing”. – I think you are exaggerating here. A maximum of 8 points behind a team had to wait until the 3rd game of the last years playoffs to confirm their position in this years league. They were never written off within the Hearts club and fanbase given Celtics history of success and the quality of player in situ.

2. “Dead and buried. A team devoid of structure, belief, and quality.” - See above

3. “Disgusting.” – not a phrase DM should have used. MON is too cute to blurt it out like that but he similarly had his frustrations with the officials. The objective of both was to pressurise and influence future decisions

4. “Sam Nicholson doesn’t just catch Austin Trusty with an elbow he also handles the ball in the process. It’s clear on replay. Clear in stills.” – there is nothing crystal clear about this at all. Some have said that Sams arm is only raised because it was accidentally forced upwards in the collision. In addition, we were told last week by the same VAR team that not every hand ball is a penalty. I haven’t seen any reference to Saturday nights non penalties, for some balance. The distance the ball travelled also suggested it was a header (maybe through his hands). I appreciate we’ll never agree but surely the last thing you use in any analysis is still images! Some of the doctoring I’ve seen online are laughable. Two balls, mangled fingers and even a EPL logo on a strip!!

5. “That even Alex Rae, not exactly a card-carrying Celtic apologist”, - selective comment given that Pat Bonnar didn’t think it was a penalty

6. “But that won’t stop the noise. It never does.” – 100% 😉

7. “Despite blatant decisions going the other way, like Maeda being wiped out by the Motherwell keeper earlier in the same match.” – Two players going in opposite directions, neither looking at the opponent. – never a penalty. In such circumstances outside the box the ref usually gives a foul to the defender, in this occasion the referee played on”

8. “And let’s not forget - zero penalties conceded by Hearts all season”. – Laughable to imply there was favourable treatment. This has been cemented by last night fact that your bogey-man referee awarded a penalty in the 9th minute of 5 minutes extra time. Incompetence, not agenda has always been my standpoint

9. “Yes, clearly, the grand conspiracy is working exactly as planned by fenian fifth columnists.” – is it mandatory to have at least one reference to religion or race? Lazy

10. “The irony? Hearts thought they had it won” – absolute nonsense. Celtic equalised and went 2.1 up relatively early which removed the possibility of it being won last night.

11. Crates full of Premiership champions livery sitting outside Tynecastle, ready to be erected.” – if there was any livery it was the league looking to maximise photo opportunities, not the club. Your implication is otherwise.

12. “In reality, the pressure sits squarely on their shoulders. They’ve led this race since September. They’ve had control. They’ve had consistency.” – The pressure must surely be on the chasers in front of a home crowd, Given the run of form you have and the respective level of players in place and most players having been over the course before. And as for the consistency remark, I see no reference to Hearts not winning an away game between January and April and being in poor form. Thankfully there was a freedom of play on display last night that’s not seen since December.

In a way I’m happy you won last night as it now will be won on points rather than goal difference. All I ask is that we get a fair chance with no controversy.

Mon the JT's

12 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?